[libvoikko] grammar checker checks
Francis Tyers
ftyers at prompsit.com
Fri Sep 27 18:04:42 EEST 2013
El dv 27 de 09 de 2013 a les 16:47 +0200, en/na Tino Didriksen va
escriure:
> On 19 September 2013 10:33, Francis Tyers <ftyers at prompsit.com> wrote:
> El dc 18 de 09 de 2013 a les 18:06 +0300, en/na Harri Pitkänen
> va
> escriure:
> > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 11:06:57 Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > 3) In the long term, might it be possible to replace the C
> ++ checks with
> > > a constraint grammar file ?
> >
> > I really would like to do that at least for those checks
> that could be
> > implemented with a constraint grammar. But in the near
> future that does not
> > seem to be possible. Here the license of vislcg3 is a
> problem. Currently the
> > Finnish grammar checker under its MPL/GPL/LGPL tri-license
> could (in theory)
> > be integrated into LibreOffice core but vislcg3 can only be
> used in an
> > extension.
>
> The authors of VISLCG3 would probably be quite happy to
> consider
> trilicensing it. I put Tino Didriksen in copy, who is the main
> developer.
>
>
> Eckhard Bick and I have discussed this at length today, and the
> conclusion is against changing the current CG-3 dual-licensing model
> (Commercial + GPLv3) at this time. Eckhard does not want to eclipse
> the commercial avenue by making CG-3 LGPL and/or MPL.
>
>
> If it was possible to grant LibreOffice an exclusive non-transferable
> license to use CG-3, Eckhard would be ok with that, but LibreOffice
> rejects that idea (I asked #libreoffice-dev). LO strongly requires all
> code going into LO Core to be at least dual-licensed LGPLv3 and MPL.
No problem, in any case, we will have that avenue open if the fomacg
stuff continues being developed. In fact, it would give more impetus. :)
Fran
More information about the Libvoikko
mailing list